July 13, 2005
Talking Transportation: Terror on the Tracks
By Jim Cameron
Special to WestportNow
The news of the recent terror attacks in London should not really come as a surprise. After the Madrid bombings in March 2004, it was really only a matter of time before terrorism struck again at such a vulnerable target as mass transit.
![]()
Our government has proven itself unable to protect the homeland, so seeing state troopers and police riding Metro-North trains seems like an act of PR, propping up public opinion, rather than acting as any deterrence.
According to the House Transportation Committee, since 9/11 we have spent $11 billion improving aviation security, or $9.16 per passenger. In the same time we have only spent $115 million on mass transit, or $0.006 per passenger.
Homeland Security has tried some experiments in improving rail safety -- scanning checked baggage in Washington, D.C. and creating a security perimeter around the Hagerstown Md., rail station.
But their craziest experiment of all happened right here in Connecticut.
In July 2004, a Shore Line East train was outfitted with an extra car carrying bombing sniffing and metal detecting equipment (on loan from manufacturer GE which is obviously eyeing lucrative contracts).
Passengers boarding the train at all stations first had to enter the “security car” and as the train moved along, were screened for explosives. That’s right -- they got on the train and then were screened. But isn’t the idea to keep the bombs off of the trains, not find them in transit?
What can realistically be done to improve safety on our trains and subways? In my view, not much. There are hundreds of miles of track, scores of stations and thousands of passengers to control. Consider some of the possibilities:
ID checks before boarding? For what purpose and of what deterrence value?
Airport-style secure zones and screenings? Can you imagine thousands of riders arriving 60 – 90 minutes before departure to cue for screenings twice each day? They’d abandon the trains and be back in their cars in a flash.
A cop on every train? Be honest: do you really think a determined suicide bomber would stop at his grizzly task if he saw a cop on the train? And with a 10-car Metro-North train carrying more passengers than a 747, what good is a cop at the front of the train if something happens a quarter-mile behind him in the rear car?
Bomb-sniffing dogs on every train? Maybe. But we don’t have anywhere near enough trained canines to handle the hundreds of trains each day on Metro-North.
So what’s a commuter to do? In my view, rely on your own instincts. Be watchful of your surroundings, unattended bags and suspicious behavior. If you see something that doesn’t look right, report it.
Last year, after the Madrid bombings, I was on a Metro-North train headed into the city when a passenger came into my car, spoke softly with the conductor, and sat down. Two other passengers followed him, now speaking in more excited tones.
They said there was a dark skinned man in the other car sweating profusely, looking at his watch, reading an Arabic newspaper and playing with something in his briefcase. The conductor radioed ahead and our train was stopped in the Bronx. MTA Police in body armor boarded and took the man off the train.
To my eye he looked like any other commuter. Sweating, perhaps because he’d run for the train. Looking at his watch, because he was late for an appointment. Fumbling with something in his briefcase, maybe to find his Blackberry. Reading a foreign newspaper, to catch up on the news in his native tongue. The gentleman looked Indian, not Arabic, but he offered no resistance when he climbed off the train.
Paranoia? Xenophobia? Or have our enemies really won and left us terrorized?
I’m still riding the train and taking the subways. But I’m not expecting the authorities to prevent the inevitable -- further terrorist attacks right here in the United States.
(Editor's Note: Jim Cameron has been a Darien resident for 14 years. He is vice chairman of the Connecticut Metro-North Shore Line East Rail Commuter Council and a member of the Coastal Corridor Transportation Investment Area, one of five Transportation Investment Areas established by the Connecticut General Assembly in July 2001 to develop 20-year strategic plans for each of the state's major transportation corridors. He is also a member of the Darien Representative Town Meeting. The opinions and accuracy of information in this article are the responsibility of the contributor. E-mail him at jim@camcomm.com or www.trainweb.org/ct)
Jim,
I'd like to hear more about the GE security car before I would dismiss it out-of-hand.
Posted by: Allan Siegert at July 14, 2005 07:27 PM"Our government has proven itself unable to protect the homeland..."
What basis do you have for this statement? Can we find impartial journalism anywhere anymore?
Posted by: rach unger at July 14, 2005 09:18 PMRach, That finding was actually published last month by a joint commission of transportation authorities. The representatives ranged from airlines, Rail lines (both Fright and Passenger), highways, and Port Authorities. The fact that the state of Montana has received almost the same amount of homeland funds per capita as has the state of New York was pretty interesting. So, knowing who i voted for and then reading what i have read I would have to say that the author was not being partial. These are facts. The fun of politics is one thing but when one begins to realize that a group that we (I) elected is not doing their job is very much another.
Posted by: bill at July 15, 2005 09:36 AMReply to Allan...
The GE machinery probably works just fine... but the time to find a bomb is before its on the train, not when the train is rolling.
We don't screen airline passengers in flight, do we?
JIM CAMERON
Posted by: Jim Cameron at July 15, 2005 10:14 AMThere is honestly very little that can be done to avoid the mayhem caused by a dedicated individual, or group, who wants to create pain and death amongst groups of people, and mass property destruction. I think, though, we should look carefully at where the lion's share of such US destruction originates: with people who are US citizens, members of the larger community of US citizens and indistinguishable from them. The Murrah Building, the school shootings, most of the bombings of family clinics, the Atlanta bombing, riots that have occured with great destruction (and several deaths) in multiple cities around our country; these were events instigated and carried out by our neighbors and friends, not by foreign agents and international subversives. Targeting people because of their appearance or religious beliefs is not only unConstitutional, but sheer madness.
I do not suggest that we need to be afraid of every other person on the face of the earth, but there are a (fortunately) insignificant very few extremists who go to these lengths. It has happened since the beginning of time (remember Julius Ceasar, for one of many?) and it will continue until the last soul goes to meet his/her Creator. Vigilance is necessary. Typecasting, paranoia, and a "Communist behind every bush" syndrome will do nothing to make terrorism attacks of one sort or another any less likely.
On the contrary, to attempt invulnerability is to encourage these madmen to prove they can bypass any security measure set up to defeat their wiliness, and each to try to make a bigger splash than the last one. Without destroying the very freedoms of travel, selection, and speech that are so dear to us and becoming a fascist nation, we have no way to preclude a certain amount of this madness.
Those responsible should be located, tried as the murderers they are, and put where they can never repeat their miserable performances. But they should be so convicted with all due respect to Constitutional rights, laws of the land, and consideration that we should be giving any criminal. I am unwilling to yield *any* of our freedoms under our Constitution to "ensure safety against foreign agents" when it is our own rights and freedoms that will suffer in the process.
Tom Fairbairn
Posted by: Tom Fairbairn at July 15, 2005 03:29 PM

